26 October 2026 · 5 min
My opinion of AI in music production
I started my YouTube channel in 2017 soon after the original MPC Live was released, the first of the new generation of MPCs.
As the years went by, more and more channels popped up with tutorials on how to use the Live and the other new MPCs that followed it in the Gen 1 range. A few things started to grate on me.
Many channels were either copying techniques that I believe I was the first to share publicly, or many of the videos were seemingly being made by users who appeared somewhat inexperienced.
But they had good cameras, played the numbers game by uploading tons of nonsense videos, or used clickbait titles or sensationalised subjects which had little to no value when it came to actually providing useful educational content.
I know, I sound salty right? But that's how it gets when you plough hours, days, weeks, months and years of time and passion into something, only to be overshadowed by less experienced folk jumping on the bandwagon out of nowhere with a better camera and an over excited personality. I'm a lot more reserved, and try and keep it calm and low key, choosing to rarely show my face but rather focus on using the gear in question.
Anyway, some of these people either shared incorrect information or demonstrated they had little understanding of fundamental sampling and sound engineering techniques that only us 'old heads' could have learnt from 'the struggle'. I come from a HipHop background where keeping it real was something I always upheld, so for me, it was a cringe-fest, and still often is.
Even before the onset of AI music generation, where literally anyone and their neighbours girlfriend's mum's cat can 'create' their own music, the scene (electronic music production in general or the beat-making scene) suffered from plenty of disingenuous behaviour.
Now AI is here, perversely I actually don't mind it as I get the feeling it will hopefully expose those who have done nothing to deserve any genuine respect. There is potentially a whole new generation of aspiring producers who will be cheating from start to finish.
The implications are already clear, at a time when genuine creators are already up against it with the pittance-to-nothing revenue from music streaming.
Prompt your agent, make a something-type tune, create an alias and logo, upload to Spotify, done.
So that's music creation, AI generated or not.
Vibe coding
So this brings me to the currently trending topic of 'vibe coding', a buzzword I have only discovered whilst in the middle of doing exactly that for the last several months. If you don't already know, vibe coding is the practice of prompting AI agents to create software and plugins by those who have some amazing ideas, but lack the full gamut of coding skills.
Here is where I will possibly sound like a total hypocrite, possibly to someone who has been coding audio for years. I totally understand how it must feel to have been a programmer for so long, only to have AI come along and provide unskilled users the ability to create their own plugins, software and firmware, basically overnight (overnight compared to how long it would take to manually code something of value).
However, after embarking on a project myself, it's not that black and white. I have spent several months developing my own VST drum machine and it simply wouldn't have been possible without my 30+ years experience of producing electronic music and being a sound engineer and designer. Well, that's my excuse anyway. It's not like I just jumped in from being a pillow and duvet salesman and decided to create some audio software.
Using AI to code my idea has saved me an unfathomable amount of time and stress. To be able to send prompts to a suitable AI agent, drawing on all my knowledge of general music production, drum programming and more, for it to end up as a very useable virtual instrument has been amazing.
I see vibe coding as a very different thing to getting AI to automatically arrange or fix a mixdown in Ableton Live. It's unbelievable when you read comments from people online, claiming they don't enjoy the mixing or arranging process, and are genuinely glad to use AI for it - where is the fun in that?
So it's a very grey area.
I plan to go live on my YouTube channel sometime in November 2026 to present the drum machine plugin I have designed and there will undoubtedly be Instagram posts and announcements on this website.
I'm being careful in how I communicate my involvement as I know there'll be comments either asking if it was 'vibe-coded' or potentially outright dismissive comments labelling it as 'AI trash' or 'slop'. I will certainly not be bullshitting anyone and claim to have coded it myself, that would be downright stupid if anything.
Designed. Directed. Visualised.
Not coded or programmed.
I may be splitting hairs but it feels a little disingenuous of me to claim I have created it. Directed, had the vision for, prompted, designed, sat for countless hours testing and re-prompting. Had the balls and audacity to share publicly, knowing the potential backlash and resulting damage to my rep. Yeah, sounds a bit dramatic but if you put yourself out there, things can get spicy sometimes! I really hate some of the negative energy you get dragged into online and navigating it diplomatically can be pretty tiring.
Regardless, I believe there's plenty of justification to claim you have created something but not done the bulk of the heavy lifting for. Quantifying the effort required to own that claim is not easy. As said, it's a very grey area.
By using the word designed as opposed to 'created', at least I may be seen at the very least as owning up to what I contributed to it. In my opinion, vibe coded or not, the plugin is very useful, sounds great and solves some common issues producers face when making electronic music, specifically when it comes to breakbeats. All shall be revealed in due course….